03-02-01 01:58
No 176036
I guess the thread I started got lost somehow during the database upgrade. Everything is working a lot faster now by the way
. Anyway, this might sound stupid to more knowledgeable bees and whatnot, but is there some kind of way to obtain Red P from Phosphoric acid since it's made from it? Society exists by chemical affinity, and not otherwise.
(Hive Bee)
03-02-01 03:23
No 176048
Yes. Here's something I recently copied from the library.
(Hive Addict)
03-02-01 08:20
No 176080
This is indeed a stupid question. Have you been unconscious for the past several months?
(Hive Bee)
03-02-01 22:23
No 176188
PolytheneSam, thanks for the info. So they don't make Phosphoric acid from Red P? This is weird because the Merck Index says they do
, but I see that it doesn't even matter if the Phosphoric acid was made from Red P . Damn, a bee just needs to acquire an electric furnace, calcium phosphate, sand, and coal (which are all available in large quantities and completely unwatched) and they could have Red P up the ying yang. Given that it was done properly and with extreme care. Hey, when they say phosphorus they’re talking about White P right? Society exists by chemical affinity, and not otherwise.
(Hive Bee)
03-03-01 01:46
No 176224
That page came from a book dated 1919 (published or copyrighted). If the Merck Index says that they make phosphoric acid from phosphorus than that's probably true now. The phosphoric acid and carbon process seems to be older than the one using phosphate, sand and carbon. I've seen people discuss phosphoric acid here before but I've never seen any details about making phosphorus from it. I posted something in the Meth forum about this but I didn't know anything about the temperature involved with the phosphoric acid and carbon process then. The threads in the meth forum seem to scroll off a lot faster compared to other forums. I found that reference after I posted that last thing about the patents.
(Hive Bee)
03-04-01 06:14
No 176392
I've been searching for patents on Red Phosphorus
production too, but I haven't found anything worthwhile yet. I'm gonna go check out those patents that you posted though and hopefully that will help SWINM along their journey. I think more bees should start looking into making their own Red P (and Ephedrine too) these days. I2 seem a lot easier to obtain than Red P. Hay, do you know what the yield would be in this phosphate, sand, and carbon process?
Society exists by chemical affinity, and not otherwise.
(Hive Bee)
03-04-01 09:06
No 176411
Here's a better list.
417943 452821 460004 527163 602747 1168495 1274479 4287165 3437379 3366447
You have to look at the low number (<2000000) patents on the USPTO web site using AlternaTIFF.
http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/PSPF.
(Hive Bee)
03-04-01 12:34
No 176433
Please be aware that this process makes white phosphorus, which is rather unpleasant stuff.
Hansje Pansje Kevertje.....
(Hive Bee)
03-04-01 17:32
No 176457
I also found this:
The phosphates of heavy metals dissociate more readily than calcium phosphate. It has therefore been proposed to convert the calcium salt first of all into lead phosphate from which the phosphorus could be obtained at a comparatively low temperature. Another suggested modification is the use of metals as reducing agents instead of carbon: 6NaPO3 + 10Al + 3SiO2 --> 3Na2SiO3 + 5Al2O3 + 6P. These methods, however, have not become of technical importance.
(from Inorganic Chemistry by F. Ephrain 1954, page 193)
Also see US patents 1648146 and 3923961 which compare tricalcium phosphate, monocalcium phosphate (triple super phosphate) and calcium metaphosphate.
(Hive Bee)
03-04-01 22:24
No 176482
Here's an idea I had. If the temperature wasn't too high then you could probably use a glass retort like the one in the picture. The still can be flushed with a gas that doesn't react with P, ie. N2. A gas reservoir can be used such as the bell jar in a pan of water as shown in the picture to allow heated gases to expand. A gas generator is shown on the far right, but if CO2 reacts with the P at a high temperature than it can't be used. The metal pan under the retort is for safety. Temperature control for the heater can be provided by the variac shown in the picture. The side arm Erlenmyer flask can have water in it to cover the phosphorus (white) that distills over.
(Hive Addict)
03-05-01 02:12
No 176522
um ya might having the whit p in hand go of course back to red phosphorus the real question of course is why bother making meths if ya can sell multikillos of red phosphorus and likely gain the trust of many a good friends i would think/yes?
anyways drip whit p onto carbon sulfide likely could use some kida anciant slags, refuse fron mine heap, thus dripping the white p in uv light this could be done on the move simply poking a pin hole in something dripping the stuuf onto a plate where the slag sit thus outside, forms a beatufuil sludge that is redish black soma addational cleanup may be desirable though i doubt you will in fact bother?
Amethystium
(Hive Bee)
03-07-01 00:36
No 177006
Thanks for the info and suggestions people. I've been reading through all those patents and hopefully SWINM will be experimenting in the near future. SWINM was thinking about buying some White P and messing around with it too, but it's now a watched chem also.
Society exists by chemical affinity, and not otherwise.
(Hive Bee)
03-11-01 02:45
No 177786
The process for making phosphoric acid is in this thread, also.
http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6
http://www.privacy.org
(Hive Bee)
03-11-01 09:15
No 177837
maybe you could hook a high vacuum pump to your setup. it would lower the melting point, and also evacuate out the air.
If pacman influenced us, we'd glide around dark rooms eating pills and listen to repetitive music.
(Moderator)
03-11-01 14:10
No 177875
Sam: Your title has now been changed. Heh. Hope you like.
Stoni
(Stranger)
03-13-01 12:45
No 178210
AAAAArgh. NO! Wait a minute, I don't mean to be disparaging but have you checked out the safety info on WHITE P, yes they used to manufacture it by distilling sand carbon and (Urine, BTW-they used to buy it in the poor quarter after checking it hadn't been watered down by using a hydrometer).BUT, the white form of P EXPLODES on contact with air and is also very poisonous (all white, red and black are, all poisonous but whites the worst), white is readily absorbed thru the skin and removes calcium from your bones!!!!
So, enough ranting, PLZ check it ALL out before you play!, maybe just use your Phosphoric to generate HI from KI or NaI, sure it needs a greater volume of HI if you don't have the red there recycling, but you wont be blown in an unpleasant way either!!
Keep up the good work!
When the day is bad,and life's a curse
CHEER UP!!! Tomorrow may be Worse!!
('HAGAR' Comic)
(Master Searcher)
03-14-01 01:18
No 178310
I like the title, Stonium. I think it fits. Thanks.
MMM, I read these warnings for the last two weeks. Stonium's post on P and I2 has been in the Newbee forum for a long time for everyone to read. I never heard of P exploding. I thought it just caught on fire in the air (above 34-37º C). I don't think P can explode unless it is mixed with an oxidizer or is finely divided. I've played with fireworks a lot, too. I think its an interesting element. It can also be used to make alkyl halides by mixing an ROH with P and a halogen. Tryptophol comes to mind......
http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6
http://www.privacy.org
(Stranger)
03-14-01 11:10
No 178402
True, explodes may not be strictly accurate, but it does convey a more accurate perception, napalm doesn't explode either. I saw a pic in a book once of a guy in FULL safety suit holding a lump of white P in tongs, the burning sparks were spraying for about 5 meters. Also the Germans used it in WW2, when the lumps of burning P landed on your head the only way to put them out was immersing your head in water, but as soon as you came up for air ... your on fire again. It is really nasty, if you want HI use the phosphoric for that and just use more HI in the reaction (since there's no red to reform it when its used). I personally regard it as similar to generating cyanide, yes you can do it if you're CAREFUL, but do you really want to risk it???
that said, good luck
When the day is bad,and life's a curse
CHEER UP!!! Tomorrow may be Worse!!
('HAGAR' Comic)
(Master Searcher)
03-15-01 01:05
No 178537
What if the WP is kept under water in the receiver that it was first distilled into? It could probably be converted to RP under water by irradiation and I2 catalyst without even ever exposing it to the air.
http://www.privacy.org/article.php?sid=6
http://www.privacy.org
(Ubiquitous Precursor Medal Winner)
10-14-01 03:12
No 224224
Another suggested modification is the use of metals as reducing agents instead of carbon: 6NaPO3 + 10Al + 3SiO2 --> 3Na2SiO3 + 5Al2O3 + 6P. These methods, however, have not become of technical importance.
Nobody has ever noticed, even though this quotation has been repeated on Hive at least 3 times, that they are talking about aluminothermy here. The Goldschmidt process. It's fucking thermite.
Now wait. We are talking here about producing phosphorus in a closed system with no external heat source. No pressure fittings. Nothing coming in, nothing going out, while the batch burns, produces and condenses its phosphorus vapor, leaving you a pool of solidifying white phosphorus safely under water. In which you drop a few grams of iodine and forget about for a week or two, as sunlight safely converts it into red phosphorus, under water.
This is absolutely an order of magnitude less difficult to do for yourself than any kind of furnace technique. The apparatus you need is a retort and alembic, designed and built a thousand years ago. If your culture has never reached the ceramic stage, you can probably use metal for a substitute. Don't stick a thermometer or pyrometer anywhere. You don't want to know how hot it gets. Don't stick a gas fitting on it to purge out the air. The bit of air initially present in the apparatus will blow out into your water receiver as P2O5, instantly converted into harmless dilute phosphoric acid as it hits the water. Don't complicate it. Just light it off, drop the cover on it, and stay the fuck away while it does its job.
Details: The bottom of the reaction vessel has to bee covered with pebbles and sand, lots of it. Thermite gets real hot, melts iron easy. The charge? Anything! Metaphosphoric acid is purest, but any version of phosphoric acid or any phosphate will definitely be reduced by aluminum powder, will definitely produce elemental phosphorus in vapor form, will definitely work. (I don't think you need any sand in your charge. What the fuck for? Well, may bee it sticks to the alumina to keep it out of the vapor train. You can just use the rxn above as a guide, cuz they know and I guess.)
To set off the charge, get real assertive. Don't just stick a magnesium ribbon in the top for like a fuze, it'll fizzle. Give it some help, with a generous primer of magnesium turnings mixed with a solid oxidizer. Not enough rocket mix to blow the top off your rig, or you're in a world of shit. It ain't going to stop, come hell or high water, once it gets started.
The burn might take about a minute, and the P vapor produced has a place to go, under that water. Have a continuous flow of cool water running into your receiver during the burn, the heated excess splashing out. Might even want to stick a few bags of ice in there. No appreciable amounts of any other gases are produced, for the aluminum's making alumina.
Hey, this really does sound like a backyard project now! Shall we make this a method of technical importance?
turning science fact into <<science fiction>>
(Hive Bee)
10-14-01 21:21
No 224472
(with hesitation UTFSE said)
i like more control. using an arc between two carbon rods easily gives mucho heat. the whole generation is controled by the old current and voltage regulation (various ways)
the sand in the process is used to convert the calcium to slag so as to remove it BUT ONLY when you are starting out with a phosphate rock.
phosphoric acid to white P still seems like the best route IF the heat is there.
And as someone said just burn off the H and CO thats generated.
Or if your dirigible needs a boost-------------?
always appreciate your time and consideration
(Hive Bee)
10-14-01 21:28
No 224474
but here is to Sir Halfapint - because your method certainly wins for simplicity and kitchen caveman chemistry.
I think Thermite easily melts steel rails together so that's about 4000 anyway.
I assume the iodine is the catalyst along with UV?
In situ RP (sorta)- who'd thunk it.
always appreciate your time and consideration
(Distinctive Doe)
10-15-01 03:31
No 224563
Nice Job Halfapint!!!
This is the shit for home phos production.
Here is some info.
Reduction of metallic oxide to metal
Reduction
The conversion of metal oxide into metal (by removal of oxygen) is called reduction.
Generally the 3 methods used are:
Reduction by heating the oxide
Chemical reduction
Electrolytic reduction.
Chemical Reduction Processes
Under this process the oxides of metals that are in the middle of the reactivity series are reduced to free metals using chemical reducing agents such as carbon, aluminium, sodium or calcium.
1. Reduction by carbon process
Oxides of metals like zinc, iron, copper, nickel, tin and lead are reduced using carbon as the reducing agent.(note: phosphorus is done this way) Carbon can be used only if it has greater affinity for oxygen than the metal. For example, carbon can reduce copper oxide to copper, but it cannot reduce calcium oxide. It can reduce zinc oxide.
ZnO + C -----> Zn + CO
Zinc metal Carbon
monooxide
2. Reduction with aluminium by thermite process
Metals which are too active to be obtained by reduction of their oxides with carbon are reduced using aluminium, which is a more powerful reducing agent.(note: It will reduce Phosphorus!!!) Chromium and manganese oxides are reduced using aluminum. This reaction is highly exothermic.
Cr2O3 + 2Al -----> 2Cr + Al2O3
Chromium metal
3MnO2 + 4Al -----> 3Mn + 2Al2O3
Manganese metal
……………………………………………………………………………………………
http://www.compassbox.com/cbse/demo/chem
And More.
Thermite reaction.
Soon after metallic aluminium was first isolated, both Sainte-Claire Deville and Wöhler noted its property when mixed in the form of powder or granules with the oxides of some of the metals, of reducing them with the evolution of sufficient heat to melt the metal and the alumina produced [1].
On this was based the process applied by Dr Hans Goldschmidt of Essen, who in 1898 was developing commercially the promising work of Claude Vauntin and Hugh Picard in London, following the change in the economics of aluminium supply which had taken place when production by the Héroult and Hall electric furnace method superseded the expensive sodium reduction process; prior to that time the use of aluminium as a reducing agent was little more than a scientific curiosity [2]. Goldschmidt has obtained either the metal, or an alloy of the metal, with aluminium, from the oxides of chromium, manganese, iron, copper, titanium, boron, tungsten, molybdenum, nickel, cobalt, zirconium, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, cerium, thorium, barium, calcium, sodium, potassium, lead and tin. He said:
In a thermite reaction, a metallic compound is reduced by one of several metals or metallic alloys in such a way that when the mixture is ignited at one place, the reaction continues of its own accord, so that under complete oxidation of the reducing element, a fluid slag is formed, while the reduced metal is obtained as a homogeneous uniform regulus; if the oxide is used in excess, the reduced metal is free, or practically free, from the element used as a reducing agent.
Goldschmidt’s significant innovations comprised the means of starting the reaction by a fuse, instead of heating the mixture until ignition took place, and the various controlling procedures which made the process practicable on a plant scale.
This is the first of two solid/solid reactions, see also experiment 18a. This reaction, uses powdered aluminium metal to reduce metallic oxides and is especially useful for the reduction of those metal oxides which are difficult to reduce such as titanium and molybdenum. It is also known as the Goldschmidt process, and the Aluminothermic process. This is a highly exothermic reaction and the metal emerges in its molten state often very much above its melting point. A mixture of finely divided aluminium with ferric oxide (or the oxide of some other metal), approximating to 2Al+Fe2O3, is sold under the registered name Thermit (no final ‘e’), and is used in joining or welding iron and steel rails, pipes, etc. Sections of railway lines are usually welded in this way and the reaction is mostly associated with the reduction of iron oxide as in our demonstration. Like the first part of the next demonstration this reaction takes place between solids and is, consequently, difficult to start.
Two equivalents of finely divided aluminium and one of iron oxide are mixed together and ignited. The reaction takes place as follows:
Fe2O3 + 2 Al ==> Al2O3 + 2 Fe + 848.54 kJ (17.1)
Safety. This is a hazardous procedure, but is a safe demonstration in experienced hands. However, there must always be a first time, and it is to those persons that we offer the following advice. Read the safety recommendations of say reference 7 below.
First perform this experiment outdoors a couple of times, preferably use a table as you would indoors. There are very few demonstrations that can safely be performed for the first time in front of an audience and, in this case, we recommend that you practice at least twice more indoors before regarding yourself as sufficiently experienced and competent. It is always a good idea to get someone else to work with you as an equal partner, in that you should both be equally familiar with the procedure, and both sense the burden of responsibility. In these circumstances the partners should assume individual and collective responsibility and so will ‘watch out for each other’. For example a teacher might involve his technician in this way.
It is important that the Thermite mixture is perfectly dry otherwise extremely hot material might be violently ejected from the crucible. Dry the components separately at ca. 125C. Do not use heat to dry the mixture use a desiccant.
Metallic iron is produced at a temperature significantly above its melting point at 1535C. Once the reaction has started it is almost impossible to stop it. A CO2 fire extinguisher should to hand; water should not be used because potentially explosive hydrogen can be produced. No one should be closer to the reaction than two metres.
References
1. Thorpe’s Dictionary of Applied Chemistry, 4th ed., vol. XI, London - New York - Toronto, Longmans, Green and Co., 1954, pp. 562-565.
2. H. Goldschmidt, German Pat., D.R.P. 96317, 1895; Z. Elektrochem., 1898, 4, 494; Ibid., 1899, 6, 53; Electrochem. Metall. Ind., 1908, 6, 360; Stahl Eisen, 1898, 18, 408; H. Goldschmidt and C. Vautin, J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1898, 17, 543.
3. J.W. Mellor, A Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, vol. 5, new impr., London, Longman, Green and Co., 1956, p. 218.
4. Tested Demonstrations in Chemistry, ed. G.L. Gilbert, et al., vol. 1, Granville, OH, Denison University, 1994, p. H-9.
5. P.J. Roebuck, Educ. in Chem.(Britain), 1979, 16, 178.
6. J.R. Crellin, Educ. in Chem. (Britain), 1980, 17, 93.
7. B.Z. Shakhashiri, Chemical Demonstrations, A Handbook for Teachers of Chemistry, vol. 1, Madison, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1983, p. 88.
8. G. Fowles, Lecture Experiments in Chemistry, 3-rd ed., London, G.Bell & Sons, Ltd., 1947, pp. 285-287.
http://www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/delights/tex
More References
Microscale thermite reactions.
J. Chem. Educ. (1998), 75(12), 1630-1631.
How to get the most from the dichromate volcano demonstration: aluminothermy.
J. Chem. Educ. (1984), 61(10), 908.
The thermite lecture demonstration.
J. Chem. Educ. (1979), 56(10), 675-6.
Abstract
A lecture demonstration of the thermite reaction is described. The mixt. of Al powder and Fe2O3 is ignited by the heat produced on oxidn. of several milliliters of glycerin added to KMnO4 crystals placed in a small depression on the surface of the reaction mixt. The reaction can be carried out in a small clay flower pot with a sand bath to collect the molten Fe, with the whole setup being surrounded by a proper safety shield to contain sparks and provide protection from this highly exothermic reaction.
A modified thermit lecture demonstration.
J. Chem. Educ. (1981), 58(10), 802.
Abstract
A lecture demonstration using Thermit with a KMnO4-glycerin ignition mixt. is described.
Do Your Part To Win The War
(Ubiquitous Precursor Medal Winner)
10-15-01 06:33
No 224619
Thanks, UTFSE, and thank you, Foxy2. This came on just like a flash, it hits you and you know it's right, can't bee any question.
It's not needful to stress this is a hazardous operation. Anybody who sets up to do this and is not nervous, is in need of some serious help. But we should get specific about the failure mode of this particular operation, for anyone who may not have the imagination to know what we are nervous about.
Thermite reactions are dangerous because they get hot and you can't put them out. This is not just a plain vanilla thermite reaction. It produces a vapor which is spontaneously flammable in air at its formation temperature. It is a deadly poison. A lot of this vapor is produced very fast, and its production is unstoppable.
This reaction fails if this vapor does not all go into the water. In case this reaction fails, you will have a very large fire in the sky above the apparatus. Your neighbors will notice. If you do not run far and fast, you will be injured. A dense and caustic white smoke of phosphorus pentoxide will form. In great volume. You will be notorious.
So have some sense, and get nervous. Make everything sturdier than it has to be. Test things. Make a dry run. Make a small pilot run. This one, you can't fuck up and get away with it. It's dangerous.
I'm thinking I might just run the condenser pipe into loosely packed crushed ice in the receiver tub at the start of the reaction. That will give minimal back pressure to start with. As the reaction progresses, the temperature and pressure of the vapor will both increase, while the ice is melting. The retort head will be held on the reaction vessel with heavy clamps. That's where failure is intolerable, but I want to be able to fasten them down pretty damn quick, before things get hot.
turning science fact into <<science fiction>>
(Distinctive Doe)
10-15-01 07:34
No 224637
Yep
VERY DANGEROUS
I would try very small batches to see how this works. Possibly multiple small batches would greatly increase the safety margin. Maybe do it way, way out in the desert where you can't burn anything down.
An external ignition method would bee ideal. Who knows how vigorous this reaction is? You could try a model rocket ignitor stuck in a little pile of (gunpowder? or something highly flamable) mixed with some magnesium powder. Once the magnesium is lit I imagine the whole thing will go, (hopefully not EXPLOSIVELY!!!)
Do Your Part To Win The War
(Hive Bee)
10-16-01 02:57
No 225004
post deleted by UTFSE cause it was so dumb.
Oh embarassment - --cringe shudder.
(Hive Bee)
10-16-01 03:40
No 225029
Okay we are on the right track but let me say a couple of things concerning Al.
Powdered and granulated aluminum are used in pyrotechniques
Principally it is THE ingredient in flash powder.
It does go boom when mixed with an oxidizer (i think) it does go boom spontaneously from friction/pressure.....
It is very dangerous. It will take your fingers to see God.
There are several chemicals with which it is entirely uncompatible.
Make it your busienss to know which ones.
I think sulfur is one.
Everyone in the pyro pages says mix no more than 10 grams of this stuff at a time and then with a ten foot pole.
I have about a pound of this stuff in powder form. And about a million in various other forms - foil, extruded, etc. Most are probably alloys.
Several question loom (SP) like how are the various alloys in this readtion?
How does one obtain rather large quantities of powder without large quantities of danger.
Ball milling is used but is it done underwater ?
this is exciting - I am looosinnnngngn it - dAVE. r u there
always appreciate your time and consideration
(Hive Bee)
10-16-01 04:00
No 225036
I hate it when I have to respond to myself ---however-------
small - tiny vesuvious type eruptions happening in small thick walled ceramic spaces with vast condensing coils of stainless leading to icecubes brimming over in large cast iron club footed bath tubs. Yes bring it on.
Did i fail to mention the ice cold water circulating around and about the shiny stainless steel coils sweating, working hard in the moonlight.
This started with H3PO4 ==> P + et al but the main thing is that RP is easy once the hard thing white P is obtained.
Go go I have got to calm down now.
I truly need a general. but a nurse will do.
Now isn't that better.................
always appreciate your time and consideration
(Master Searcher)
10-16-01 04:01
No 225037
I looked through about 25-30 chemistry books in the library to dig up stuff like this. Its about time you try to make use of it. Also, I read in two books that terra cotta retorts were used for making and distilling phosphorus. I recently saw a terra cotta vase in a store. If a still head could be made for it, maybe some electrodes could be put in it (the vase), ie. screws put through threaded holes. For the thermite process, maybe metal pipe might be the best.
http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/PSPF.
(Hive Bee)
10-16-01 04:06
No 225040
Polysam- I too have been searching. I have posted many dumb ass questions trying to stay in touch with anything to do with white phophorous.
I use Mellor's, Lange, anybody, everybody that I can get a lead on in. Duh..
But the vesuvious demos just whizzed by me. I didn't even read them in Shakhashiri, cause I guess after many hours on many nights I was just too tired to pay attention.
Thank you sir(s)- may I have another?
always appreciate your time and consideration
(Distinctive Doe)
10-16-01 04:49
No 225065
This actual form of the thermite reaction is probably not documented or has only been tried by a few due to the obvious hazards involved.
Do Your Part To Win The War
(Hive Bee)
10-16-01 09:56
No 225185
> I never heard of P exploding. I thought it just caught
> on fire in the air (above 34-37º C). I don't think P can > explode unless it is mixed with an oxidizer or is finely > divided.
2 words. Phosphorous grenades. Yes, they're finely divided (and quite possibly mixed with an oxidizer - been a LOOONG time since SWIW was making explosives...) - but it's dangerous stuff.
(Distinctive Doe)
10-16-01 16:20
No 225241
I also don't think phosphorus is explosive, (not sure on this tho) Those phos. grenades have a regular explosive, the phosphorus is there to burn the shit out of anything in the area.
By explosively I meant that your reaction vessel could explode. This reaction needs to be in a relatively contained vessel to maintain the inert atmosphere and if the pressure builds up to fast that vessel could go BOOM, which would be like a Phos. grenade, NOT PRETTY.
Here is one idea.
Maybe a mixture of Aluminum, carbon, SiO2 and phosphate could be used to mediate the reaction. It would be ideal if you could set it up so the reaction needs moderate heat to proceed but stops when heat is removed. That MIGHT bee possible with the mix I described, who knows?
Someone calculate the enthalpy of this reaction for us.
6NaPO3 + 10Al + 3SiO2 --> 3Na2SiO3 + 5Al2O3 + 6P.
This reaction MAY actually require heat to work, that would bee great because then the reaction is controlable! It is not the same as those thermite reactions because of the SiO2 which has very STRONG bonds that might eat up much of the energy liberated when Al2O3 is formed. Someone calculate this, it might be better than we think!!
I cannot find a heat of formation for sodium hexametaphosphate?? Anyone have access to the PREDICT program? Their site says it will calculate it.
Do Your Part To Win The War
(Hive Bee)
10-16-01 20:45
No 225343
let me reiterate something- with this near explosion happening visa vi the very rapid burning of thermite I am very concerned with the gases produced. The pathway to the condensor for the P vapour will also have to carry H and CO and whatever else is vaporized. All expanding gases and in a rather rapid sequence.
This ain't gonna be know drops per minutes situation. Perhaps an intermediate holding vessel for expanding gas and then into a condensation device.
But then there's that oxygen problem - inert atmosphere problem. Maybe an expanadable bladder- high temp.
And how does one keep the splatters from clogging the tube exiting the reaction vessel?
always appreciate your time and consideration
(Chief Bee)
10-16-01 20:51
No 225348
Required reading for people contemplating the preparation of phosphorous from urine/phosphates/phosphoric acid:
"The 13th Element : The Sordid Tale of Murder, Fire, and Phosphorus" by John Emsley - many free pages are available at http://www.amazon.com
(Hive Bee)
10-17-01 01:32
No 225445
RP in most certainly explosive (when mixed with an oxidizer of course). Search the web for "Armstrong's Mix" I think it's called. Thats the formula. Armstrongs mix is the shit used in those champagne bottle shaped streamer popper things.
blah blah blah something clever blah blah blah
(Distinctive Doe)
10-17-01 07:12
No 225597
well since this reaction is a reduction there are no oxidizers unless the ambient air gets in and i don't think air is sufficient for an actual explosion, however it will burn vigorously.
Do Your Part To Win The War
(Hive Bee)
10-23-01 00:20
No 227869
Okay I read it. Beside the verbal graphics nothing I ain't aware of.
The poisoning is most scary. Murder by definition came from another being not phosphorous. I suspect a lot of heinous activities came from greed and avirace on the part of SWI-phosphorous.
BUT all our talk is aimed at OTC.
If your objective is to drain the swamp then you gotta put up with a few aligators. Sometimes you win sometimes they win.
(Hive Bee)
10-23-01 00:51
No 227876
Okay where do I send my dues for the HalpAPint fan club?
And one question Oh Diety master sir - do these insights just pop out or are you on drugs?
always appreciate your time and consideration
(Ubiquitous Precursor Medal Winner)
11-02-01 15:57
No 232125
OK this is how to do it. Think vertical. Use a bubble cap still, like those used in the petroleum industry. My early examples of these were made of cat food cans, like a model of the big ones. But here, we can't use soldered cans in the lower stages -- too damn hot for too damn long, under too much pressure.
Build the lower stages sturdy, using bolts. Allow plenty of headroom, and use shallow water, in wide pans, with plenty of bubble caps in these high pressure lower stages. Easiest bubble cap construction is a tube shaped like an upside down J with its open tip immersed in water.
In the upper stages the heat and pressure criteria are relaxed. It can be built in a conical taper, like a ziggurat, smaller toward the top. Leave a vent in the top stage, and just flare off any vapors you can't tame. Not while you're breathing, though. A proper sized reaction for your apparatus should give nearly zero vapors out the top, if you use the pure thermite reaction. Foxy's way using carbon and silica as diluents for the thermite would produce vapors in normal operation. It seems it would be very tricky trying to balance the charge so it would still burn, and if it burned I'm not sure it would slow it down that much. Don't complicate it, until you get the simplest method down.
All right, with a bubble cap still your layers of WP sitting under water will solidify when they're not in the sunlight, so you can't use mine and PolySam's simplified RP conversion scheme. You will have to use the heating method, with exclusion of air, which gives faster conversion to RP. That will bee after you dig every morsel of that rubbery, glowing, toxic solid WP out of every pan of your bubble cap still. At least it won't burst into flame on contact with air any more, after it gets cold, so you can pour the water off from your pan.
turning science fact into <<science fiction>>
(Hive Bee)
11-02-01 18:58
No 232178
h-p how stable is P vapour? seems like the solid phase is the only "dangerous" form - relative to fire/explosion.
I have viewed these fraction columns in my search for - well most anything to do with hydrocarbons. Wish you could get a graphic (or a link to a graphic) for your alluded to design.
Silver solder might work - my mig welder would surely work.
just glad to bee here-----he he he
(Chief Bee)
11-02-01 19:02
No 232181
P vapor can definitely ignite explosively in the presence of oxygen.
(Distinctive Doe)
11-02-01 19:54
No 232200
Here is how to clean your equipment(safely). If I was dreaming MA then I might just get rid of all the white phos this way, turn it right into a much safer chemical.
Big bucket of conc. KOH solution(NaOH should work to, maybee), make sure you have excess hydroxide.
P4 + 4KOH + 4H2O --> 2H2 + 4KH2PO2
Hmmm I'll bet some bee's could find a use for POTASSIUM HYPOPHOSPHITE
If you don't have excess then this happens, nasty and deadly phosphine is formed
P4 + 3KOH + 3H2O -> PH3 + 3KH2PO2
Do Your Part To Win The War
(Ubiquitous Precursor Medal Winner)
11-27-01 09:23
No 241161
Returning again unto our first ways and so retracing our paths, let's get back to the retort type apparatus. This seems more likely to get built, and to have fewer places to go wrong.
The retort arm descends at a steep angle to its bend, a reinforced elbow joint resting on, or cast into, a block. This block might have provisions for moderate auxiliary heating, if it is thought to be necessary. From the elbow stretches a long pipe of large diameter (put your fist in it) which descends at a shallow angle into a trough of water until its far end is just submerged.
You do not want to have the end of your condenser pipe in deep water. You want to show minimal back pressure to any impulse pressure. Burning solids have granulations and hot spots, they burn sometimes irregularly. Since you can't tell how strong a pressure wave might bee, you don't want to trap it. You want to let it go. You want it to bubble out and flare freely in the air, as far may bee from your main apparatus, and from human noses. So put the end of the pipe in shallow water, not in deep water.
I have also changed my opinion about the water temperature. I no longer think ice water would be ideal starting coolant for this reaction. You don't want to end up with solid phosphorus in your pipe, in fact you want it liquid all the time it is in your pipe, so it will all flow out into the water. A phosphorus blockage is one of the prime things you want to avoid. Using these considerations, I might want to put warm water in my trough to start with. Steamy warm, maybe 50 or 60 degrees, to make sure that condenser pipe holds runny liquid phosphorus with no tendency to congeal. Again, though, as the reaction progressed, I might wash out the old water with new cooler water, at a flow rate which does not threaten to splash out any phosphorus.
The main differences I see now, with the way I pictured it at first, is the use of the elbow block, and starting with warm water not ice water. Plus the decision, that if anything pushes too hard, to let it go. You are polluting a bit, as anything that bubbles from the end of the pipe gets carried away by the breeze into the natural environment, but if you can ensure people and large mammals are not in the way, you cause no mortal harm. This way I think we can run, still a dangerous run, but I think we've worked the suicidal aspects out of it.
turning science fact into <<science fiction>>