Bandil
(Hive Bee) 02-05-03 12:03 No 404680 |
Error in proc. on rh's page | Bookmark | ||||||
../rhodium /red-al. On the page in the experimental section there is stated: Typically, a solution of the substituted benzaldehyde (1 mmol) and NH4OAc (1.25 mmol) in nitroethane was refluxed for the specified time. The mixture was cooled immediately in liquid N2 or Acetone-solid CO2, diluted with CH2Cl2, and filtered while cold. Solvent was removed in vacuo, and the remaining beta-nitrostyrene was recrystallized by known procedures6. AFAIK the given procedure would give the corresponding nitropropene and not the nitrostyrene... |
||||||||
pHarmacist (Hive Addict) 02-05-03 16:13 No 404736 |
Yeah Bandil | Bookmark | ||||||
Nitromethane would yield nitrostyrene... Accept No Imitations, There Can Only Bee One; www.the-hive.ws |
||||||||
Rhodium (Chief Bee) 02-05-03 21:50 No 404796 |
vague, not wrong | Bookmark | ||||||
It is no error, phenyl-2-nitropropene is beta-methyl-beta-nitrostyrene so calling it a beta-nitrostyrene is just being vague, not wrong. You could say "nitroalkene" too, being even more unspecific as to exactly what compound is being discussed. Just take a look in Pihkal, where Shulgin refers to substituted phenyl-2-nitropropenes as "nitrostyrenes" all the time. |
||||||||
Bandil (Hive Bee) 02-06-03 12:33 No 405058 |
*hmmm* I guess you are right rhodium... | Bookmark | ||||||
*hmmm* I guess you are right rhodium... |
||||||||