flipper
(Hive Bee) 11-06-03 15:00 No 469121 |
Sunlight's CTH MDA | |||||||
In post Post 335851 (Sunlight: "MDA and MDMA from CTH reductive amination", Novel Discourse) Sunlight says this:
|
||||||||
Rhodium (Chief Bee) 11-06-03 15:34 No 469127 |
The Pd/C is reusable. | |||||||
That is almost 20% Palladium w/w to the ketone and then it is going to be an expensive hobby. The Pd/C is reusable. |
||||||||
flipper (Hive Bee) 11-06-03 17:51 No 469163 |
If SWIM want's to do a 1 Kilo batch he needs... | |||||||
If SWIM want's to do a 1 Kilo batch he needs Catalyst with 200 grams of Palladium. That costs 1000 Euro's and if he reuses that damn stuff 5 times it still is expensive. If this works with 20% w/w 10% Pd/C then a 1 Kilo batch the Palladium only costs 100 Euro's. God that is a fucking difference. Especially when he reuses that catalyst 5 times. Do this reaction works like claimed with 20% w/w 10% Pd/C?? Economics is everything and Palladium isn't getting cheaper. Only more expensive. |
||||||||
Rhodium (Chief Bee) 11-06-03 18:37 No 469169 |
MDMA vs. MDA | |||||||
It seems like a much higher catalyst load is needed when MDA is synthesized, compared to MDMA. When MDMA is the desired product, the catalyst load is a lot less: When we tought time ago about a similar rxn to this one, we thought as well in making MDMA. We added a bit of aq methylamine and formic acid to methanol, and then a bit of Pd/C and we observed a clear decomposition of the formate, so we tried the rxn with aq methylamine and formic acid and TLC was very good, then we make a test with 3 gr: 3 gr of ketone, 4.4 ml of 40% methylamine, 2.4 ml of 98% formic acid in 30 ml of methanol, 300 mg of 10% Pd/C stirred 48 hours, 83% yield. |
||||||||
flipper (Hive Bee) 11-09-03 11:55 No 469775 |
And Urushibara. If I use an Overload amount of | |||||||
And Urushibara. If I use an Overload amount of Urushibara would it work equally good as Pd/C for MDA? |
||||||||
Rhodium (Chief Bee) 11-09-03 17:56 No 469802 |
I have never heard of any Urushibara CTH being | |||||||
I have never heard of any Urushibara CTH being tried out. |
||||||||
flipper (Hive Bee) 11-09-03 18:08 No 469804 |
Ok. Raney Nickel. Would Raney Nickel work? | |||||||
Ok. Raney Nickel. Would Raney Nickel work? And normal hydrogenation? |
||||||||
Antibody2 (Hive Addict) 11-09-03 22:19 No 469832 |
don't give up so easy | |||||||
i think it is high time some enterprising bee triied out Urushibara catalysts with a CTH. In fact Ab2 clearly remembers seeing a reference for a Ni catalyzed CTH with formic acid as the hydrogen donor, it might have been posted by jim like two years ago or so We are all just witnesses. |
||||||||
SPISSHAK 11-11-03 02:41 |
try this on for size!!!
(Rated as: no sources!) |
|||||||
flipper (Hive Bee) 11-11-03 07:01 No 470114 |
In this paper Reductive Amination Review They... | |||||||
In this paper Reductive Amination Review (../rhodium /reduct In that paper Pd/C or Pt catalyst also doesn't do a very good job. Raney Nickel produces High Yields At low pressure in this paper so maybe Raney Nickel is the way to go. At least it sounds logickel. |
||||||||
SPISSHAK (Hive Addict) 11-11-03 07:34 No 470120 |
the reduction works with nickel | |||||||
because it's activity is W-4 and the equilibrium between ketone/imine/and amino carbinol is to the left |
||||||||