|
|
dormouse
(Member)
04-22-00 22:38
No 108675
|
|
|
|
for Rhodium -mormon_trailer
|
Bookmark
|
|
the Hive BB Novel Discourse for Rhodium profile | register | preferences | faq | search next newest topic | next oldest topic Author Topic: for Rhodium mormon_trailer unregistered posted 03-13-99 03:37 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- email me, I was going through some of our old discussions on this matter : http://rhodium.lycaeum.org/chemistry/yeast.txt and I have some new ideas and corrections to make. Rhodium Administrator posted 03-15-99 02:45 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My email is rhodium@nym.lycaeum.org - Perhaps you would also want to talk to Shulgin about your thoughts on Salvinorin et al, he'll include a chapter on those diterpenes in his forthcoming book, QIHKAL. Beagle Member posted 03-15-99 02:59 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Is there really a QIHKAL in the works? Please say yes. What does the "Q" stand for? Rhodium Administrator posted 03-15-99 08:34 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iso-Quinolines I have... It is a reference work on all cacti alkaloids (+ some opium alkaloids), plus chapters on non-alkaloidal psychoactive compounds and plants, such as diterpenes like Salvinorin (he mentioned something like 300 mint-like plants containing 1000 diterpenes which might be candidates for self-trials) - he also said he would include GHB and its analogs in that chapter, he contacted me because he liked my invention 4-Me-GHB Bella***** Member posted 03-15-99 08:43 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rhodium: Is 4-Me-GHB from y-valerolactone? I decided not to say anything about it in my 'brainstorming' thread in General. I guess I could have though. ------------------ Bzzzzzzz Rhodium Administrator posted 03-16-99 10:16 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes it is, and about 1.5 as potent as GHB, slightly longer lived, and the effects are more anti-anxiety and less euphoric. The synthesis was carried out as follows: 8 grams (0.2 moles) of sodium hydroxide was dissolved in 50 ml of methanol with gentle heating, and some insolubles was filtered off. 20 grams of gamma-hydroxy-valerolactone (0.2 moles) was added as fast as the exothermic reaction allowed, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and the wet, soapy residue was dried in a desiccator over CaCl2. The crude product was finely ground in a mortar, placed in a buchner funnel, washed with 200 ml of acetone and sucked as dry as possible at the pump. After drying over CaCl2, the Sodium gamma-Hydroxy-Valerate, a deliquescent, white, crispy and slightly soapy powder, weighed 26.9 grams (96% of theory) and had a pleasant aromatic odor, and a taste not unlike that of Sodium GHB itself. Mormon__Trailer unregistered posted 03-17-99 07:36 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- with 128 optical isomers alone, plus hundreds of feasible subs. ... do the math! there are easily hundreds of thousands of potential salvinorin homologs. Rhodium Administrator posted 03-17-99 07:53 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, but not naturally occurring, which was what Shulgin was referring to. rev drone Member posted 10-16-1999 12:50 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ...Not to mention essentially ZERO information on any structural activity relationships, other than that salvinorin B, identical in every way to salvinorin A minus one acetoxy group, showed none of the same entheogenic qualities that salvinorin A did. Its cute synthetic chemistry (well, not even that really), but not of any practical value. ------------------ -the good reverend drone Rhodium Administrator posted 10-16-1999 01:23 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oh, this was an old thread... Are you referring to Shulgin's book? psychokitty Member posted 10-20-1999 02:09 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rhodium: Is Shulgin ever going to do a reference work on cathinones? CIHKAL maybe? --PK Rhodium Administrator posted 10-21-1999 11:36 AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I doubt that. As he is throwing in all kinds of compounds in this book, I have a feeling he is going to make it his last *IHKAL book. Why can't you write a CIHKAL for my page, you're the expert on that topic, right? All times are CT (US) next newest topic | next oldest topic Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic Hop to: Select a Forum or ArchiveList of Forums:General DiscussionAcquisition DiscourseChemistry DiscourseMethods DiscourseNovel DiscourseCrystal MethSerious Chemistry ForumThe Hive CouchSerious Tryptamine DiscourseAdmin Chill-out TentList of Archives:Couch ArchivesClassics!Law and OrderThe litter box.misc. PEAs
Contact Us | the Hive Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.39a © Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.
|
|