NaBH4 Phtalimide Deprotection of Amines
An Exceptionally MIld Procedure

By J. O. Osby, M. G. Martin & B. Ganem1

Tet. Lett. 25(20) 2093-96 (1984)

HTML by Rhodium

Summary

Phthalimides are converted to primary amines in an efficient, two-stage, one-flask operation using NaBH4/2-propanol, then acetic acid.

The development of stable but easily removable amine protecting groups continues to interest both synthetic organic and peptide chemists2-5. Particularly in peptide synthesis, the choice of appropriate N-blocking groups is a critical decision if racemization is to be avoided6. Sometimes exhaustive substitution of primary amines is desirable to remove both acidic hydrogens, thus modulating nucleophilic character. Phthalimide groups are well-suited to this purpose, but would be more widely employed if deprotection could be achieved without resorting to hydrazinolysis. Because of that shortcoming, other more esoteric blocking groups such as the OX7, N,N-diallyl8 and STABASE9 derivatives have been recommended as alternatives. We now report a gentle, near-neutral method for removing phthalimide groups that should rekindle interest in these derivatives as practical and versatile amine protecting groups.

Central to our plan was the conviction that o-hydroxymethyl benzamides like III ought to lactonize rather easily under acidic or basic conditions with concomitant release of the primary amine. The neutral by-product phthalide (IV), a weakly electrophilic carbonyl compound, should be removable by extractive workup. Since phthalimides undergo extremely facile hydrolysis to phthalamidic acids, we first tried to prepare III by selective hydroboration of those acids. This approach was only marginally successful with N-benzylphthalimide, affording III (R=benzyl) in 40-60% yield. However when III was treated with potassium tert-butoxide, benzylamine and phthalide were released in high yield, underscoring the viability of this strategy.

The partial reduction of I was next examined as a more expedient route to III. Hydride reductions of succinimides can usually be controlled to furnish II10, but over-reduction often results in both cyclic and acyclic products. In 1961, two papers described the NaBH4 reduction of phthalimides to complex product mixtures in a highly solvent, concentration and workup-dependent process11,12 One group detected variable (but always low) yields of phthalide in some reductions11. More importantly, Uhle12 discovered that reductions in aqueous 2-propanol, although slow, formed III in good yield.

The Chart below illustrates the effect of varying this solvent mixture to achieve maximal reduction rate. Using 6:1 2-propanol:H2O, we found a wide variety of substituted phthalimides were reduced to III in high yield (24h, rt; see Table). Addition of ZnCl2, MgCl2 or CoCl2 (which forms cobalt boride13) had little effect on the rate of reduction, which was even more sluggish with LiBH4. No reduction whatsoever was observed with NaBH3CN.

Cyclization of III to IV with release of the free primary amine was best conducted in aqueous acetic acid (pH 5) for 2h at 80°C14. While certain α-amino acids may racemize in glacial acetic acid at reflux15, the Table shows that several phthalimide derivatives of such structures were smoothly deprotected.

Table 1.
Reductive Removal Of Phthalimides Using Sodium Borohydride

RNPhtha Product (Yield)
Rotation
Lit. Rotatione
PhthNCH2Ph PhCH2NH2 (81%)c
---
--
PhthN(CH2)9CH3CH3(CH2)9NH2 (88%)
---
--
PhthN(CH2)3CO2HNH2(CH2)3CO2H (97%)
---
--
PhthN-L-Phef L-Phe (70%)d
-30.9°e
-32.5° (c=1.9, H2O)
PhthN-L-GluL-Glu (95%)
+25.7°
+24.9° (c=1, 6N HCl)
PhthN-L-TrpL-Trp (89%)
-28.2°
-28.0° (c=0.5, H2O)
PhthN-L-Ala-L-Tyrb L-Ala-L-Tyr (95%)
+40.8°
+39.7° (c=2 H2O)

Notes.
a. Specific rotations of optically active phthalimides,
where known, matched reported values.
b. [α]D = +59° (c=1, EtOH).
c. Controls showed 18% loss during workup due to volatility.
d. Volatile: controls showed 25% loss during freeze-drying.
e. Product rotations were obtained at the literature reported
concentrations; these rotations all correspond to ammonium salts.
f. Deprotection of PhthN-L-Phe methyl ester was complicated
by some reduction and some hydrolysis of the methyl ester.

Experimental

Representative Procedure

To a stirred solution of N-phthaloyl-4-aminobutyric acid (0.200g, 0.86mmol) in 2-propanol (7.7mL) and H2O (1.3mL) was added NaBH4 (4.30 mmol). After stirring 24h, TLC indicated complete consumption of starting material. Glacial acetic acid (0.9 mL) was added carefully and when the foaming subsided, the flask was stoppered and heated to 80°C for 2h. The crude reaction mixture was then eluted onto a Dowex 50 (H+) column (2.7x10cm), washed with H2O (150 mL), then eluted with 1 M NH4OH (200 mL). Ninhydrin-active fractions were collected and pooled for freeze drying, and thus afforded γ-aminobutyric acid ammonium salt (0.100g, 97%) with no measurable loss of optical activity. In fact, the specific rotation of L-tryptophan was unchanged after 24h exposure to the deprotection conditions. Phthalimides may thus reemerge as useful peptide blocking groups.

 

References and Notes

  1. Camille and Henry Dreyfus Teacher Scholar Grant Awardee.
  2. R. Barthels, H. Kunz, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 21, 292 (1982)
  3. G.A. Epling, M.E. Walker, Tetrahedron Lett., 23, 3843 (1982)
  4. B.P. Branchaud, J. Org. Chem., 48, 3538 (1983)
  5. For an exhaustive compilation, see T.W. Greene, "Protective Groups in Organic Chemistry," Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1981, Ch. 7.
  6. For an overview, see M. Bodansky, Y.S. Klausner, M.A. Ondetti, "Peptide Synthesis," 2nd Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1976, Ch. 4.
  7. J.C. Sheehan, F.S. Guziec, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 94, 6561 (1972)
  8. B.C. Laguzza, B. Ganem, Tetrahedron Lett., 22, 1483 (1981)
  9. S. Djuric, J. Venit, P. Magnus, Tetrahedron Lett., 22, 1787 (1981)
  10. J.C. Hubert, J.P.B.A. Wijnberg, W.N. Speckamp, Tetrahedron, 31, 1437 (1975)
  11. Z.-I. Horii, C. Iwata, Y. Tamura, J. Org. Chem., 26, 2273 (1961)
  12. F.C. Uhle, J. Org. Chem., 26, 2998 (1961)
  13. S.W. Heinzman, B. Ganem, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 104, 6801 (1982)
  14. C.J. Belke, S.C.K. Su, J.A. Shafer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 4552 (1971)
  15. B. Liberek, Z. Grzonka, A. Michalik, Roczniki Chem., 40, 683 (1966); Chem. Abstr., 65, 3960e (1966)